Vyond-styled rants

Note: This page has previously been on Atrocious YouTubers Wiki and Horrible Vyonders Wiki before being imported here.

Vyond Style Rants are, well, rants that users make on in Vyond/GoAnimate. They have been reoccurring in Vyond/GoAnimate since the 2010s, and are still in production to this day. They are also reoccurring outside of Vyond.

How these Rants are styled
A Vyond/GoAnimate styled rant starts with the user mentioning the show/movie/game/user's name, and follows that with a "More Like" that normally consists of a vulgar alternative (eg, in Brendan Barney's rants Yo Gabba Gabba becomes "Yo F*cka F*cka" and Caillou becomes "Screw You", "Crapillou" or "Poopilou"), however sometimes users may use racial or homophobic slurs, but these have since stopped being used after the community guidelines became more strict, and also because they were only used to make the users look "Edgy" while reviewing a kids show.

Some rants feature the user often saying to the viewers that they decide to change rants because they are too lazy to do this rant or say to them if they like this show or this show is from their childhood, they know the drill.

After the name mockery, this is followed up with "Oh my god!" or "Oh my f*cking god!", "This show/movie/game/user sucks!"

If the show/movie/game is a rip off or ruined something, they say that the show/movie/game ripped off or ruined one of the things they like or hate, and then say which is way better than this or which is bad enough. Typically the user who claims the show/movie/game rips off another is wrong, if both shows/movies/games have no connection to each other, or maybe if the user claims the show/movie/game rips off another is right, like if the user said Super Why! is a ripoff of Little Einsteins or if the user said Coconut Fred's Fruit Salad Island is a ripoff of Spongebob Squarepants.

Then the user starts talking about the show/movie/game itself. These sections are half-hearted and show how formulaic these rants can be. To begin with, the term "failure adventures" makes no sense at all, secondly, they give poor reasons to hate the character which may show that the user might have not even watched the source material. If they talk about a character that is cried. They will tell the viewers that they are going to laugh at the character at the next picture. The user then says Why? and show a picture of the character crying and laugh their heads off. Some rants may describe the character as "No one gives a crap/sh*t/f*ck/f***ing sh*t about them, not two or three either, not even four" or a variation on the term.

Some mostly focus on fictional dog characters, where they can threaten them to feed it chocolate, which is animal cruelty.

After talking about the characters, they then say The animation is crap, the stories are lame, the music is boring, the plots are pointless, the songs are pieces of trash, the theme song is garbage, the voice actors are complete jerks, and the characters are idiots. This, once again, would show that the user may have not even bothered to watch a full episode of the show they are ranting on.

Some ranters then go over the edge, by saying things like that the characters would want to have sex at night, smoke pot, eat feces for dinner, drink their own urine when they are thirsty, go to school naked when it's time for their school to begin, wearing diapers as their underwear, and jack off/masturbated when they are bored. Not only are some of these disgusting, but why would they even say that? And these characters from these preschool shows also never do those kind of things in their actual shows.

This is then followed up with a "I wish this show would get cancelled" or "Thank god this got cancelled", depending if the show was still running at the time the rant was made/if the show is still running today or if it was already cancelled, and then says who would like or hate the show/movie/game, even if the character has no connection to the show the user just ranted on.

The user then says "Screw/F*ck (Topic) and screw/f*ck (non-related topic), (topic the user likes) is (insert numbers here) better than (topic). End of rant."

Then, they would talk about what rants would be up next.

Why They're Trashy Big Time

 * 1) The rants are infamous for their poor quality control, as the videos often rely on children's shows, especially well-received shows such as Sesame Street, Arthur, Kipper and Blue's Clues. Just because they are preschool shows doesn't mean that they're bad. There are even rants out of users, which are repetitive, boring, unfunny and can lead to harassment in terms of the Vyond/GoAnimate ranting community. Some rants also rely on positively well-received shows like South Park or Johnny Test being criticized and ranted on.
 * 2) The rants are sometimes done on Google Slides or on PowerPoint by using a screen recorder like Screencastify, Screencast-O-Matic, Bandicam, etc.
 * 3) *Most of them look really lazy and rushed. They don’t even cut out the white background to put the image, stock photo, or gif on a transparent background, and don’t even make their own art.
 * 4) Most of these videos use very repetitive and recycled scripts, and come off as hate-based, rather than being informative and reasonable. They also claim things that are crude, offensive, outrageous, or nonsensical:
 * 5) The users sometimes claim the that they (the main characters, though not said) like to go on failure adventures, which gets repetitive. Plus, why do they think they like to go on failure adventures? It doesn't mean a character goes on failure adventures, just because you hate that media.
 * 6) The people who make the rants even give unfair and disgusting reasons to hate any sort of media that they hate, or even make outrageous claims like the characters having sex at night, smoking cannabis, eating each other's feces for dinner, drinking each other's urine, going to school naked, wearing diapers as their underwear, masturbating, and many other things whatever claims that are often made within these videos themselves.
 * 7) The rants use users, fictional characters, and even fictional media, which don’t even relate to the media they’re ranting on whatsoever. On top of that, a user called Christmas Yes Sunny Day No is notorious for adding fictional characters in the like and hate spots in his said videos, and he got criticized for that.
 * 8) Some rants contain animal cruelty-related terms like, "If I saw him/her in real life, I would feed him/her (anything that is dangerous to animals, with chocolate being the most thing said to dogs).", which was used by Christmas Yes Sunny Day No in most of his rant videos.
 * 9) The Vyond styled salutes aren't any better than the rants themselves either, as they are similar to those said videos, but both of which are really boring to watch.
 * 10) Some rants even focus on users, which is considered cyberbullying. Even though, those were meant for criticism purposes only.
 * 11) These types of videos have been targets of GoCommentators, and the commentaries that are solely on Vyond/GoAnimate videos aren't that much better as most of the users who make these tend to either insult the users involved in the videos, or try to force them to quit making Vyond/GoAnimate styled rants, which of course always backfires as some of the users who have been commentated on by them would usually either ignore it, flag it down, amongst other things.

Redeeming Qualities

 * 1) The videos can explain a little, or even some information about the media they’re ranting on. And sometimes, it can be valid. But still, it's rare for these kinds of videos to have valid criticism.
 * 2) Just like Grounded and Punishment Day videos and Behavior Card Day videos, they could be considered "so bad, they're good". So that makes them usually funny to watch.
 * 3) *The more like terms can be very funny on these videos.

Examples
BxBlV-4ypcY HlUenjEM9LE VNi4ratWlGw ng075qhFVIk KdO5hEEfSVA

Videos
jwLhv9Vd9y0 55xQPB3waxI vDX1JmSjCQ0